Filed under: Cellphones

It looks like the FCC’s investigation into Comcast’s questionable traffic management is turning up a number of interesting details, the latest of which comes from AT&T’s Robert Quinn, who told FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell that, “use of a P2P file sharing application would constitute a material breach of contract for which the user’s service could be terminated.” Quinn was apparently quick to add, however, that AT&T hasn’t yet kicked anyone off the network for using P2P. Still, Commissioner McDowell apparently intends to use AT&T’s statement to argue against the FCC’s forthcoming order that contends Comcast secretly downgraded P2P traffic, saying that Comcast’s throttling of traffic isn’t as bad as AT&T blocking it all together. The merits of that argument aside, as TechDirt points out, given that AT&T’s beef with P2P is that it makes use of “continuous (rather than bursty) transmissions at high data rates,” their position does open up a number of interesting questions about streaming apps like Pandora, which are similarly data-intensive but, last we checked, still working just fine on AT&T’s network.

[Via Tech Dirt]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Gaming, Home Entertainment

We’ve seen our fair share of subscription-dependent giveaways in the past in the form of Eee PC’s and even the rare PS3 offer — but handing out a Wii with cable service strikes us as somewhat notable. According to an offer from Comcast, newcomers to the company’s “Triple Play” of digital cable, VOIP service, and high-speed internet will also be able to bag an honest-to-goodness Nintendo Wii on their way out the door. Sure, you’ve got to sign a two-year contract (à la mobile telco policy), but you’ll also walk away with a console that still can’t be found on a lot of store shelves. Does this signal the ultimate dilution of the Wii into a ubiquitous and truly casual mainstay, or does it simply suggest Comcast and the big N had a sweet — and likely limited — deal? Only the suits know for sure.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Displays

When you’re Comcast and you have some serious cash to throw at an installation in your new Philadelphia-based Comcast Center, you go all out on a $22 million high-definition video wall, of course. The giant display measures 27 by 87-feet and mashes 10 million pixels across modules linked by a central system that contains 27,000 GB of info, six DX700 LED digitizers, seven Encore video processors, and three Matrixpro routers. So what does it do? It’s kind of a giant screensaver that may get old over time, if you ask us. It displays the time, shows figures pushing the panels open, and plays with the space in surreal, 3D-esque animations that are, admitedly, fun to watch. Check the video after the break.

Continue reading Comcast Center’s video wall packs 10 million pixels into 27 x 87-foot display

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Wireless

We’ve definitely heard this one before, but the buzz around a proposed $12B WiMAX partnership between Sprint, Clearwire, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Intel, and Google is deafening right now, all based on a report in the Wall Street Journal. The plan is for Sprint to merge its XOHM wireless broadband division with Clearwire, and then take a total of $3.2B in investments from a host of other players: $1.05B from Comcast, $1B from Intel, $550M from Time Warner Cable, $500M from Google, and $100M from Bright House. The resulting company will be worth some $12B, and the WSJ says investors have given their final approval for the deal — a rumor we’ve already heard with no meaningful result, so take it with a grain of salt. Or a whole salt lick, actually. We’re not certain why Big Cable is so eager to dump money on Sprint after two previous ventures both folded recently, but if this goes down, it’s a pretty big boost for WiMAX, which was looking pretty sickly lately. Still, asking consumers to have faith in Sprint and Comcast and Time Warner Cable is pretty ballsy — between the three of them, they’ve probably burned everyone in America. We’ll see where this goes — we should have something official pretty soon, according to the Journal.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Networking

Never one shy to pick a fight, Comcast is now taking square aim at AT&T, which it alleges is wreaking havoc with its internet service as a result of shoddy installs of the company’s U-verse TV service. More specifically, as Ars Technica points out, while both companies use different lines outside of the home (copper coax for Comcast and twisted pair for AT&T), they each use the same coaxial wiring inside the house, which Comcast says causes “feedback” to leak back out onto its network, possibly as a result of the two services using similar frequencies or filters. That, Comcast says, has caused service disruptions for some 20,000 users in the Chicago area, with it particularly affecting those that mix and match Comcast and U-verse services. To put a stop to that, Comcast is now seeking a restraining order against AT&T, although it apparently hasn’t received one as of yet. For its part, AT&T not only unsurprisingly says that “the suit lacks merit and that the company intends to vigorously fight it,” but that it plans to significantly ramp up the roll out of U-verse in Illinois.

[Via Online Media Daily, thanks Alan M]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Wireless

Wow, it looks like someone was listening when we said that Pivot wasn’t going anywhere just an hour ago — Comcast, Time Warner (Engadget’s parent company) and Cox have all confirmed to the AP that they’ve backed out of the quad-play partnership, leaving Sprint alone to awkwardly hang out with Advance / Newhouse, which declined to comment. That must be a fun party. Of course, this also means both of the partnerships Sprint and Big Cable got into have now failed, but that doesn’t mean the competition in the space is over: both Time Warner and Cox say wireless is still in the cards for their companies, but Pivot was just too complicated a venture. Comcast hasn’t said anything yet, but promised a comment tomorrow sometime between 7AM and 11PM.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Wireless

We’re not exactly willing to sign up for even more punishment at the hands of Comcast, but all you masochists in the crowd should take note: GigaOm is reporting that the cable giant is “serious” about offering wireless services and has hired former Telefonica O2 Europe CTO Dave Williams to make it happen. It’s not clear what type of wireless is being considered, but it’s a good bet Sprint will be involved somehow: Comcast is still in that goofy partnership with Sprint called Pivot that hasn’t gone anywhere, the two companies are rumored to be talking about a nationwide WiMAX network, and GigaOm thinks there’s a chance it could up and buy the stuggling carrier outright. That would be quite a move, but it’s all just speculation for now — we’ll let you know if we hear anything solid.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Networking

Although we just heard that Comcast’s DOCSIS 3.0 rollout was on track for 2009, folks in the Twin Cities region now have exclusive bragging rights for an undisclosed window of time. Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota have become the first markets to have access to an all new “extreme” broadband (or wideband, as it were) connection, which promises 50Mbps down / 5Mbps up. As expected, the carrier isn’t being modest about the launch, claiming that users can suck down a 4GB HD movie “in about ten minutes,” compared to “more than six hours” on a 1.5Mbps DSL connection. The newfound speed won’t come cheap — for residential users, look to lay down $149.95 per month for the privilege. Even if you aren’t springing for the good stuff, current customers in the area will have their existing broadband connections hastened gratis, with 6Mbps / 384Kbps users moving up to 1Mbps uploads and 8Mbps / 768Kbps users seeing 2Mbps uploads. Kudos, Twin Cities — you just made the rest of America sick with envy.

[Image courtesy of TheRedWoodMotel]

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Networking

Although Comcast has been beating around the proverbial bush about its data-meddling ways, it seems the pressure from the recent FCC investigation efforts have forced it to play nice. Reportedly, the firm is getting set to (begrudgingly, we presume) announce that it will “stop targeting BitTorrent on the internet.” More specifically, the cable company will purportedly “boost broadband capacity” in order to make things speedier all around, but details on this tidbit were unsurprisingly absent. Nevertheless, BitTorrent has also agreed to make its software “more efficient,” but those hoping that Comcast would leave well enough alone are in for even more disappointment. The outfit still plans on managing traffic on the ‘net (standard practice, we know), but Tony Werner, executive VP and CTO, noted that it was “working hard on a different approach that is protocol-agnostic during peak periods.”

[Thanks, Mike and Kenneth]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Wireless

As unlikely as this sounds, rivals Time Warner Cable and Comcast are apparently in talks with Sprint and Clearwire over establishing a nationwide WiMAX network. According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, the companies are scrambling to get a deal wrapped up by CTIA — which takes place at the beginning of April — and could see an influx of cash from both Google and Intel in excess of $1 billion. It seems the odd-couple partners are keen to cut into heavyweights Verizon and AT&T’s ever-expanding range of at-home and mobile services by offering their own take on a high-speed data and voice system to consumers. Clearly this combination would deflate AT&T and Verizon’s big FCC bandwidth-nabs a little (and it explains why the cable players weren’t interested in the 700MHz auction), but it’s questionable whether this rag-tag team of wild card players would seriously court the public’s eye. They say America loves an underdog — even if it’s a gigantic, super-rich, corporate underdog.

[Via mocoNews]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: HDTV, Home Entertainment

Given Comcast’s notoriously shady service, we’re not exactly in favor of the company being allowed to ruthlessly torture service any more markets than necessary, but we can see why it might be a little frustrated with the FCC, which has allowed all sorts of giant phone companies to merge in the past few years, yet still recently decided to block cable companies from owning more than 30 percent of the market. Comcast and the FCC have butted heads in the past on similar regulatory issues, but this one should be particularly interesting, since FCC Chairman Kevin Martin is currently the focus of a congressional probe into his handling of the agency. We can actually sort of see Comcast’s point — the FCC probably should allow giant telco mergers while arbitrarily capping cable ownership, but really we’d prefer a lot more competition and a hell of a lot more focus on customer service from all of these companies instead of yet more lawsuits and paperwork.

[Via TechDirt]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: HDTV

You want to know — nay, you deserve to know — which service provides the most HD content. Engadget HD’s got the answer, see how your HD provider stacks up.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: HDTV, Home Entertainment

Apparently, DirecTV isn’t looking to pay its lawyers any overtime over the holiday break, as it has been settling outstanding lawsuits recently like it’s going out of style. Just over a week after it put aside its differences with Cox, the satellite provider has decided to make amends with Comcast over a suit filed in May. If you’ll recall, DirecTV was quite flustered by Comcast’s “survey,” which allegedly found that two-thirds of respondents preferred Comcast’s HD picture over that offered up by DISH Network / DirecTV. Notably, the actual terms of the deal weren’t disclosed, but spokespeople from both outfits affirmed that they were satisfied with the outcome — which, by the way, does allow Comcast to continue to cite the survey.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Wireless

In what is surely a sign that the mania around the upcoming 700MHz auction is reaching absurd levels, cable operators Comcast and Time Warner Communications both issued press releases today confirming that they would not be bidding in January’s auction. You might recall that both Time Warner (which is owned by Engadget’s parent company’s parent company) and Comcast are part of SpectrumCo, which snapped up 137 licenses covering 20MHz of spectrum the last time the FCC put airwaves on the block, so there was some speculation that the venture might ante up again this go ’round — especially since TWC CEO Glenn Britt was running around making vague proclamations about it. Still, it looks like Sprint’s exit from the alliance was enough to shelve any such plans, so it looks like the big players are still Google and Verizon. Good thing too — with this much hype over Good vs. Evil, the racket over Good vs. Evil vs. More Evil vs. Frustratingly Incompetent would be deafening.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Office Depot Featured Gadget: Xbox 360 Platinum System Packs the power to bring games to life!

Filed under: Home Entertainment

It’s not all gifts for cable giant Comcast this holiday season, as the FCC is considering a new cap on cable ownership. FCC Chairman Kevin Martin and two of the Commissioners are set to support the cap plan, which would affect any company that controls over thirty percent of cable subscribers nationwide, while the remaining pair have not made their intentions public. The FCC has conducted additional market research to bolster their argument for limiting ownership, as a previous plan was rejected in 2004 by a federal judge. While the cable industry is sure to sue if the plan moves forward, perhaps Comcast should shore up any complaints on that pesky packet spoofing issue before this gets any uglier.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Office Depot Featured Gadget: Xbox 360 Platinum System Packs the power to bring games to life!

Filed under: Networking

According to a report released by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), Comcast has yet to relinquish its data discriminating habits, and users attempting to share content via P2P could still face slowdowns and unexpected delays. Of course, Comcast’s Charlie Douglas proclaimed that the firm “does not, has not, and will not block any web site or online application, including peer-to-peer services,” but followed up by stating that it did engage in “reasonable network management to serve all of its customers with a good internet experience.” The EFF, however, saw things differently. During its own tests, it was reportedly able to confirm conclusions drawn earlier this year by the AP, and it also exclaimed that Comcast was “essentially deploying against its own customers techniques more typically used by malicious hackers.” Pretty strong words, to say the least, but we’re curious to know if the continued Comcast bashing is indeed legitimate. So, dear readers / Comcast users, are you still (or have you ever, for that matter) experiencing sketchy P2P performance, or is this all just one overblown mess?

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Office Depot Featured Gadget: Xbox 360 Platinum System Packs the power to bring games to life!

Filed under: Networking

Remember that blisteringly fast channel bonding modem Comcast showed off earlier this year? Turns out that the firm’s CEO is apparently aiming to roll out internet services that can reach up to 160Mbps down / 120Mbps up sometime in 2008. As in, next year. In a recent interview with Fortune, Brian Roberts stated that service based on DOCSIS 3.0 technology would start “rolling out” sometime in 2008, and casually noted that it should provide “more than enough bandwidth to do multiplayer online gaming.” Additionally, Cable Digital News explains that the firm has plans to cover some 20-percent of its footprint with the uber-quick service before 2009, and while we’re left to guess what areas will be covered, we’d bet locales fetching FiOS could entertain some competition. Granted, we’ve still got aways to go before we can go toe-to-toe with a certain Swede, but we’ll take any progress we can get.

[Via ArsTechnica, image courtesy of AFP / BBC]
Read - Fortune interviews Comcast CEO Brian Roberts
Read - Comcast closes in on 100Mbit/s

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Office Depot Featured Gadget: Xbox 360 Platinum System Packs the power to bring games to life!

Filed under: HDTV, Home Entertainment

It’s no secret that Comcast and the NFL Network don’t have the rosiest of relationships, and now that Comcast won a ruling (that’s being appealed, to no one’s shock) over what tier the channel was being placed on, the carrier has shot out a cease and desist letter demanding the network stop persuading customers to switch providers. Reportedly, the note contends that the channel’s iwantnflnetwork.com “violates the contract between the network and Comcast,” as it coaxes customers to ponder switching with a message reading “Switch to a TV provider that will bring you NFL Network, not hold you hostage.” The NFL Network has responded by stating that the arguments are “without merit,” and even proclaimed that users dropping Comcast “did not need encouragement from them.” Apparently, the cable operator is calling for the network to “confirm in writing” that it has halted its attempts to influence consumers by Friday, but a spokeswomen said she “didn’t want to speculate what the company would do if its demands were not met.” Ooh, that’ll show ‘em.

[Thanks, Ryan G.]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Office Depot Featured Gadget: Xbox 360 Platinum System Packs the power to bring games to life!

Filed under: Networking

Following AP reports published last week that painted Comcast in a less-than-positive light for apparently stifling BitTorrent uploads, the company has come clean (somewhat, that is). Reportedly, the firm did admit to “delaying” some subscriber internet traffic, but stated that any hiccups were “temporary and intended to improve surfing for other users.” More specifically, Mitch Bowling, senior vice president of Comcast Online Services, was quoted as saying that Comcast utilized “several network management technologies that, when necessary, enabled it to delay — not block — some peer-to-peer traffic,” but that doesn’t exactly jive with the AP’s findings. Nevertheless, Mr. Bowling also stated that the problem was “unintentional and due to a software bug [saywha?] that had been fixed.” So with that being said, are any of the afflicted users out there still seeing issues, or has all this negative attention really resulted in a change of heart?

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Office Depot Featured Gadget: Xbox 360 Platinum System Packs the power to bring games to life!

Filed under: Home Entertainment

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Office Depot Featured Gadget: Xbox 360 Platinum System Packs the power to bring games to life!