Filed under: Laptops

Now that NVIDIA’s GeForce 9400M has made its debut in Apple’s new MacBooks, Technical Marketing Director Nick Stam says that five major notebook vendors are planning to ship systems with the chipset — though we don’t know if that includes Apple or not. Stam expects NVIDIA will carve out 30 percent of the integrated graphics market for itself, partly by improving other experiences besides games — Google Earth, photo editing, day-to-day video encoding, and other activities performed by people who use keys besides W, A, S, and D. Frankly, we’re just thankful we’ve evolved past the days when we needed a 19-inch monster to perform high-impact 3D tasks without sacrificing to the sinister gods of screen tearing.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Desktops, Gaming, Media PCs

Alright, something’s fishy here. When Apple announced that the new MacBook Pro has two NVIDIA GeForce chips — the 9400M and the 9600M GT — the focus was on what that means for battery life. Absent any mention of Hybrid SLI, we assumed that was all, but PC Mag has posted some eyebrow-raising benchmarks comparing the new MacBook Pro to HP’s Pavilion HDX16t, which also features a 9600M GT. While the MacBook Pro test model fell behind the Pavilion in most benchmarks due to its slower processor, its Crysis framerate beat that of the Pavilion by 24.1 frames per second — 41.9 over 17.3. That doesn’t make a lot of sense, unless you look at benchmarks of a desktop with NVIDIA’s similar GeForce 9300 chipset and a GeForce 8500 GT — turns out Crysis runs 12.63 frames per second faster (29.19 over 16.56) in Hybrid SLI than it does on the 8500 GT alone. Is the MacBook Pro running in SLI mode when set for performance? We don’t have confirmation of that, but we’ll put it to the test in our forthcoming review — until then, feel free to grab a grain of salt while freaking out anyway.

Update: Sorry, folks — NVIDIA’s just posted a support doc that says the MBP doesn’t support Hybrid SLI in either OS X or Windows — and when running Windows, it’s locked into using the 9600M GT. We’re not sure where that Crysis boost is coming from — GDDR3 vs GDDR2, perhaps — but we’ll dig deeper in our review. Stay tuned.

Read - PC Mag (MacBook Pro benchmarks)
Read - Hot Hardware (NVIDIA GeForce 9300 desktop motherboards benchmarks)

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Desktops, Laptops

NVIDIA CEO Jen-Hsun Huang just can’t resist throwing more jabs at Intel, distracting the inaugural NVISION crowd from Battlestar Galactica star Tricia Helfer with the claim that “Larrabee hasn’t shipped so you don’t know what it is and I don’t know what it is.” The fact that we do know what it is — a next-gen hybrid CPU / GPU — shouldn’t be a concern according to Huang, because “By the time it does ship, Nvidia’s technology will be so far advanced it won’t matter.” Besides stuffing Usain Bolt-type speed into a GPU the company will keep busy working on its WinMo smartphone hardware, and software for the not-exactly-Atom-killing VIA Nano, but forget about that rumored x86-compatible hardware ‘cuz, as Jen-Hsun reminds us, “the Internet doesn’t run on x86.” For a company that lacks innovation, is “a joke,” and at least four years behind, Intel must be doing something right, because the competition can’t keep its name out of their mouths.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Desktops, Laptops

Intel has been boasting of DirectX 10 support for its various integrated graphics options for some time now, but it’s only just recently gotten around to actually releasing a Vista driver that brings its GM965 and G35 Express chipsets up to speed. Of course, NVIDIA just couldn’t help itself from getting a few (more) digs in at Intel’s expense, and it’s now kindly provided a few benchmarks to show just how badly Intel’s integrated DirectX 10 solution stacks up against the bleeding-edge DirectX 10-ready games it now ostensibly supports. They couldn’t find a single game that was able to crank out more than 5 fps, even at a lowly 1280 x 1024 resolution and with the usual graphics intensive settings turned off. Then again, 4.4 fps in Crysis is pretty much par for the course.

Read - Crave, “Intel updates graphics with multimedia capabilities”
Read - Hardware Secrets, “Are Intel chipsets really capable of running DirectX 10 games?”

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Desktops, Laptops

Following up yesterday’s trash talk with a little action, NVIDIA has disclosed plans to create a sub-$45 processing platform which the GPU-maker is calling, “The World’s Most Affordable Vista Premium PC.” The architecture will combine VIA’s Isaiah processor with an integrated NVIDIA graphics chipset, which the company claims outperforms Intel’s Celeron-based, 945 IGP/ICH4 setup handily. Apparently, the combo is capable of 36 GFLOPS versus Intel’s 6.4GFLOPS — which we shouldn’t have to tell you is a ton of GFLOPS. We’re excited about the prospect of better performance in an integrated chipset (we’ve all suffered at the hands of the GMA950), but we don’t want to see this end in a back-alley knife fight. Keep your cool, guys.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Desktops, Laptops

Looks like Intel’s plans to enter the graphics space in a big way with its Nehalem and Larrabee lines strike NVIDIA CEO Jen Hsun-Huang as being rather foolish — in a conference call with analysts today, Huang said Intel’s integrated graphics offerings were “a joke,” and that even a tenfold increase in performance would put them behind NVIDIA’s current products. Huang didn’t stop there, saying that NVIDIA was “going to open a can of whoop-ass,” and that while Intel’s graphics chips were fine for running Office, they would never cut it for gamers and other demanding users. Huang kept going, responding to questions about all those driver-related Vista crashes by saying that NVIDIA had to support new games weekly while Intel’s chips aren’t ever put to the test. Actually, that’s toning it down a bit — what Huang actually said was “You already have the right machine to run Excel. You bought it four years ago… How much faster can you render the blue screen of death?” Yeah, them’s fightin’ words — you going to sit there and take it, Intel?

[Thanks, Mike A.]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments