October 2nd, 2008 by

Sharon Stone is denying reports she wanted her eight-year-old son to get Botox for his foot odor problem, according to her attorney. Entertainment Tonight reports:
“This week it was reported in connection with Sharon Stone’s custody dispute that she wanted to have her young 8 year-old son undergo Botox treatment at this time for his feet. Sharon Stone never made this statement. It is a complete fabrication,” her attorney Martin Singer tells ET. “Sharon loves her son Roan and only wants the best for him.”
And it’s true: Sharon Stone didn’t suggest Botox for her son’s foot odor. She clearly said LASIK.
Posted in custody, Sharon Stone | No Comments »
October 1st, 2008 by

Sharon Stone lost custody of her eight-year-old son last week with little explanation as to why - until now. Turns out Sharon Stone has the parenting know-how of a jelly donut. Here’s a snippet of the judge’s ruling via People:
Saying that Stone is “unable to provide the structure, continuity and reliability that Roan needs, and candidly, deserves,” the judge cited examples of Stone’s overreactions, including her incorrect belief her son was suffering a spinal illness and her suggestion of using Botox for foot odor.
According to the papers, “As Father appropriately noted, the simple and common sense approach of making sure Roan wore socks with his shoes and used foot deodorant corrected.”
Nice. Now, don’t get me wrong, Sharon Stone is clearly a goddamn nutbar, but explain to me how airing an eight-year-old boy’s foot odor problem in the media was a smart move. Poor Roan’s about to have an awesome day at school tomorrow: “Hey, Swamp Foot! Saw your mom’s beave on cable last night.” Yeah, that’s not gonna mess a kid up. Also, I can’t believe I forgot to DVR that shit. This is why I need TiVo.
Posted in custody, Sharon Stone | No Comments »
September 23rd, 2008 by

Sharon Stone has lost custody of her eight-year-old son Roan. Her ex-husband Phil Bronstein has had primary custody and a judge refused Sharon’s pleas to change that arrangement, according to Entertainment Tonight:
According to court documents detailing a September 12, 2008 custody hearing, Phil Bronstein “shall have permanent sole physical custody of child. Court finds that Respondent (Sharon Stone) failed to meet her burden of proof and denies Respondent’s (Sharon Stone’s) request for modification of custody. The judge also notes this order is permanent unless there is a change of circumstances.
Jesus. Usually courts side with the mom unless they did something crazy. I wonder what - oh, right, it’s Sharon Stone. False alarm, everybody!
Posted in custody, Sharon Stone | No Comments »
May 28th, 2008 by

As some of you may have heard, Sharon Stone once again opened her mouth again and said some retarded shit. This time around, she chalked up the recent earthquake in China (which killed Tibetans and Chinese) as “bad karma.” The AP reports:
“I’m not happy about the way the Chinese are treating the Tibetans because I don’t think anyone should be unkind to anyone else,” Stone said Thursday during a Cannes Film Festival red-carpet interview with Hong Kong’s Cable Entertainment News. “And then this earthquake and all this stuff happened, and then I thought, is that karma? When you’re not nice that the bad things happen to you?”
Wow. Now that’s the kind of crazy only a post-menopausal woman could unleash. At any rate, Sharon’s movies are now barred from the largest theater chain in China effective immediately:
Ng See-Yuen, founder of the UME Cineplex chain and the chairman of the Federation of Hong Kong Filmmakers, called Stone’s comments “inappropriate,” adding that actors should not bring personal politics to comments about a natural disaster that has left five million Chinese homeless, according to The Hollywood Reporter.
That would be an awesome punishment except for the fact that Sharon Stone was banned from movies forever after making Basic Instinct 2: Hey, Remember my Vagina? True story.
Posted in Sharon Stone | No Comments »
May 22nd, 2008 by

Dear Ms. Stone,
If you have inside information that proves it’s actually 1992 and not 2008, kindly forward it to my immediate attention. In the meantime, I’m gonna have to ask you to put those things away. Yeah, you’re at Cannes - Woo-hoo! But, please, don’t make me unleash the Jean-Claude on you. The man can still kick pretty high after he takes his blood thinner and enjoys a warm breakfast of Quaker Oatmeal. (I’ll safely assume you’re enlightened on the importance of regularity.)
In closing, thanks for all the boners when I was in junior high and always had to go to the chalkboard. Finally, I had something to complement the acne.
C’est la vie!
The Superficial Writer
Posted in bikini, Sharon Stone | No Comments »
May 21st, 2008 by
It has been over 15 years since Sharon Stone showed her vajayjay in Basic Instinct and that was bad enough. I would not want to see it now that it is over 50. So ewwww.
addthis_url = ‘http%3A%2F%2Fseriouslyomg.com%2F%3Fp%3D8254′;
addthis_title = ‘Thankfully+Sharon+Stone+wore+underwear’;
addthis_pub = ”;

Posted in Sharon Stone | No Comments »
May 9th, 2008 by
A day in the life of Sharon Stone and Melanie Griffith together is as exciting as their movies.
addthis_url = ‘http%3A%2F%2Fseriouslyomg.com%2F%3Fp%3D8147′;
addthis_title = ‘The+Plastic+Surgery+Club’;
addthis_pub = ”;

Posted in Sharon Stone, Melanie Griffith | No Comments »
April 30th, 2008 by
I am assuming Sharon Stone is the one in a dress and Clay Aiken is the one in the suit, but you just never know. Seriously with the matching haircuts they look like twins!
But then again maybe they are lovers? Because after all Clay has that just-had-sex hair!
Seriously I want to know what is up with this pairing! It is time for another cougar/cub relationship. Although with Sharon Stone it is more like cat/mouse because she devours her men!
addthis_url = ‘http%3A%2F%2Fseriouslyomg.com%2F%3Fp%3D8073′;
addthis_title = ‘Which+one+is+Sharon+Stone+and+which+is+Clay+Aiken%3F’;
addthis_pub = ”;

Posted in American Idol 1-5, Sharon Stone | No Comments »
April 23rd, 2008 by
Looks like Sharon Stone got a chemical peel. She should've stayed home until her face healed because that looks horrible. You know almost as bad as Basic Instinct 2.
addthis_url = ‘http%3A%2F%2Fseriouslyomg.com%2F%3Fp%3D8011′;
addthis_title = ‘Sharon+Stone+covered+the+wrong+face’;
addthis_pub = ”;

Posted in Sharon Stone | No Comments »
April 7th, 2008 by
Thank gosh Sharon Stone didn't show us what made her famous, I don't think my eyes could've handled that.
BTW what is up with all her expressions?
addthis_url = ‘http%3A%2F%2Fseriouslyomg.com%2F%3Fp%3D7872′;
addthis_title = ‘Sharon+Stone+keeps+it+closed%21′;
addthis_pub = ”;

Posted in Sharon Stone | No Comments »
December 20th, 2007 by

Sharon Stone is making big bucks just to show up at places. Apparently, 15 years later, people are still in awe about the time she showed her vagina in Basic Instinct, according to Page Six:
Insiders say she pulls $175,000 for a mere 30 minutes of face time at noncharitable events. “Sharon is starting to attend store openings and corporate events. In return, she receives major cash,” said a source.
Much like paying $1 million for a Pete Doherty sex tape, this sounds like a huge waste of money. C’mon, it’s Sharon Stone. She’s obnoxious. The only place I’d pay $175,000 for Sharon Stone to appear is the sun’s core. But only after I threw a nuclear missile into it like in Superman IV.
Posted in Sharon Stone | No Comments »
December 2nd, 2007 by
Seriously who did Sharon Stone's spider eyes and her lips? Plus her hair looks like it needs a good conditioning unless that is the look she is going for?
Posted in Sharon Stone | 1 Comment »
November 12th, 2007 by
Sharon Stone needs to put that thing away. Someone get her a skirt, a long shirt or some underwear ASAP. The good thing about Sharon Stone is if it is not see-thru shirt without a bra it is a camel toe or fur, she always makes a statement with her attire even though she tries not to. Although we are talking Sharon Stone, so you never know what she is thinking
Posted in Celeb Oops, Sharon Stone | No Comments »